| 107 | 0 | 168 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为研究草本植物对泥流的制约机制,在泥石流沟道现场调查基础上,采用量测法、公式计算法、统计图解法和分维法,分析了草本植物特征、草本植物与冲蚀的关系、冲蚀分形特征及其与冲蚀深度的关系,研究了草本植物对沟道冲蚀的影响及分形特征。结果表明:冲蚀沟呈中间深两侧浅的“U”形;根系分布角度相近时,根系横向长度越大,则深度越大,横向长度相近时,角度越大则深度越大,根系较长时,根系角度随横向长度增长变化越快,根系影响范围越大;距离草本植物越远冲蚀深度越大,明显影响范围为20 cm;分维值和冲蚀深度整体呈负相关关系,分维值越小,冲蚀深度越大,分维值越大,冲蚀深度越小。研究结果可为泥石流形成机制、起动条件及生物防治措施提供参考依据。
Abstract:In order to study the restraining mechanism of herbaceous plants on mudflow, on the basis of the field investigation of the mudflow gully, the characteristics of herbaceous plants, the relationship between herbaceous plants and erosion, the fractal characteristics of erosion and the relationship with the depth of erosion were analyzed by using quantitative measurement method, formula calculation method, statistical graphic method and fractal method, and the influence of herbaceous plants on the erosion of the gully and its fractal characteristics were investigated.The results showed that the erosion gully was “U”-shaped with the middle deep and two sides shallow.When the root distribution angle was similar, the larger the lateral length of the root system was, the greater the depth was; when the lateral length was similar, the larger the angle was, the greater the depth was, when the root system was long, the angle of the root system was changing faster with the growth of the lateral length.The further the distance from the herbaceous plants, the greater the depth of erosion, with an obvious range of influence of 20 cm.The fractal dimension value and the depth of erosion were negatively correlated, the smaller the fractal dimension value, the greater the depth of erosion.The overall negative correlation between fractal values and erosion depth was observed, the smaller the fractal values, the larger the erosion depth the larger the fractal values, the smaller the erosion depth was.The results of the study can provide reference for the initiation of mudflow formation and biological control measures.
[ 1 ] 张清春,刘宝元,翟刚.植被与水土流失研究综述[J].水土保持研究,2002(4):96-101.
[ 2 ] 王爱娟,章文波.林冠截留降雨研究综述[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(4):55-59.
[ 3 ] 郭雅丽,赵允格,高丽倩,等.黄土丘陵区草本植物覆盖下生物结皮对坡面径流流速的削减作用[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(7):1871-1877.
[ 4 ] 张宽地,王光谦,孙晓敏,等.模拟植被覆盖条件下坡面流水动力学特性[J].水科学进展,2014,25(6):825-834.
[ 5 ] 郭雨华,赵廷宁,孙保平,等.草地坡面水动力学特性及其阻延地表径流机制研究[J].水土保持研究,2006(4):264-267.
[ 6 ] 李勉,姚文艺,杨剑锋,等.草被覆盖对坡面流流态影响的人工模拟试验研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2009,17(4):513-523.
[ 7 ] 王玲玲,姚文艺,申震洲,等.草被覆盖度对坡面流水力学参数的影响及其减沙效应[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(1):80-83,91.
[ 8 ] 侯庆春,韩蕊莲,韩仕峰,等.黄土高原人工林草地“土壤干层”问题初探[J].中国水土保持,1999(5):11-14.
[ 9 ] 罗伟祥,白立强,宋西德,等.不同覆盖度林地和草地的径流量与冲刷量[J].水土保持学报,1990(1):30-35.
[10] 南轩,贺敏杰,刘艳慧,等.渗流边坡失稳过程数值模拟[J].桂林理工大学学报,2022,42(2):396-402.
[11] 吴铭洋,陈宁生,杨溢,等.三工河小流域泥石流生态:岩土工程调控措施减缓土壤侵蚀的定量研究[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2024,51(1):117-129.
[12] 晁增祖.白龙江流域泥石流高发区不同覆被坡面侵蚀特征研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2023.
[13] 张文涛,柳金峰,游勇,等.泥石流生态防治措施治理效果评价体系初探[J].灾害学,2023,38(1):186-192,205.
[14] 曹亮.高原植被对泥石流的影响[J].农业灾害研究,2021,11(12):92-93.
[15] 王化锋,韦炜,孙健.兰州市马圈沟植被覆盖度变化及对泥流发育的影响[J].湖南工业职业技术学院学报,2019,19(6):13-16.
[16] 李泳,陈晓清,胡凯衡,等.泥石流颗粒组成的分形特征[J].地理学报,2005,60(3):495-502.
[17] 倪化勇,刘希林.泥石流堆积物的粒度分布及其分形结构[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2008(3):35-40.
[18] 易顺民.泥石流堆积物的分形结构特征[J].自然灾害学报,1994(2):91-96.
[19] 吕学军,余猛.泥石流堆积物粒度分维的讨论[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(4):105-108.
[20] 杨伟,崔鹏,庄建琦,等.泥石流堆积物粒度分形特征及影响因素分析[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(2):80-83.
[21] 卫宏,靳晓光,王卫,等.泥石流堆积物的结构维数及其地质意义[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2000(3):1-5,10.
[22] 王运兴,周自强.泥石流堆积区粒度分布及分形结构特征[J].科学技术与工程,2020,20(7):2598-2603.
[23] 倪化勇,刘希林.泥石流灾害的分形研究[J].灾害学,2005(4):18-22.
[24] 钟秀梅.泥石流灾害的分形特征研究:以G212线陇南段为例[D].兰州:兰州大学,2005.
[25] 陈颙,陈凌.分形几何学[M].北京:地震出版社,2018.
[26] 易顺民,孙云志.泥石流的分形特征及其意义[J].地理科学,1997,17(1):24-30.
[27] 高鹏.流域水系的多标度分形研究及应用[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,1995,6(2):31-39.
基本信息:
DOI:10.16468/j.cnki.issn1004-0366.2025.05.001
中图分类号:S157.43;P642.23
引用信息:
[1]王运兴,史向阳,方慧.草本植物对泥流沟道冲蚀的影响及分形研究[J].甘肃科学学报,2025,37(05):1-7.DOI:10.16468/j.cnki.issn1004-0366.2025.05.001.
基金信息:
甘肃省自然科学基金项目(23JRRA1661); 甘肃省科学院优秀青年科技创新基金项目(2023YQ-06)